Employment Law Blog

News, trends and analysis in employment law and HR

Showing posts for: Wage and Hour

Photo of Matt Norris
Jun 10 2019
Q&AWage and Hour  

Q&A: Federal and state overtime laws may not be the same

Question: We have a salaried manager who sometimes helps out with production. Is he still exempt from overtime even though he doesn’t always work as a manager?   Answer: Maybe. Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), managers are exempt from overtime requirements as executives if they’re paid high-enough salaries, they customarily and regularly…

Read More…
Photo of Kandis Sells
May 17 2019
HiringWage and Hour  

WASHINGTON: Law restricts salary inquiries and requires disclosures

WASHINGTON: Law restricts salary inquiries and requires disclosures Last week, Governor Inslee signed amendments to the Washington Equal Pay and Opportunities Act, which will prohibit employers from asking candidates about their prior salary history, and require employers to provide wage scales or salary ranges to candidates upon request. When this new…

Read More…
Photo of Karen Davis
May 06 2019
Wage and Hour  

Two years of pay and hours data due by 9/30/19 for EEO-1 Report

Not only must employers submit data on pay and hours worked during 2018 on the newly expanded EEO-1 Report by September 30, 2019, but they must also include pay and hours data from 2017. The requirement to provide pay and hours data applies to employers with 100 or more employees.…

Read More…
Photo of Karen Davis
Apr 30 2019
Wage and Hour  

Alert: 2018 EEO-1 Report pay and hours data due by September 30, 2019

Alert: 2018 EEO-1 Report pay and hours data due by September 30, 2019 September 30, 2019, is the deadline for employers with at least 100 employees to submit data via a soon-to-be-expanded EEO-1 Report on their employees’ hours worked and W-2 wages from 2018, a federal judge ruled yesterday. Here are the key…

Read More…
Photo of Sean Brown
Apr 02 2019
Wage and Hour  

Technicality overturns 9th Circuit decision regarding use of prior salary

Due to a technicality, the U.S. Supreme Court recently threw out the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ 2018 decision that barred employers from using prior salary history to justify paying employees less than their opposite-sex colleagues. The federal Equal Pay Act allows employers to explain pay differences between men and women…

Read More…
Photo of Jon Benson
Feb 13 2019
Q&AWage and Hour  

Q&A: Watch out for pattern of identical time card entries

Question: We have a strict policy requiring hourly employees to receive prior approval for any overtime work. Are there any concerns with this type of policy?
 

Read More…
Photo of April Uzzardo
Jan 11 2019
Q&AWage and Hour  

Q&A: Ensure proper pay for after-hours emails

Question: I have a dedicated, hard-working employee, a Production Lead, who always stays on top of their work, often checking and responding to work emails after hours but not recording the time. What is my obligation, if any, to pay them for this time? Answer: Your organization is potentially facing exposure…

Read More…
Photo of Jon Benson
Dec 17 2018
Q&AEmployee BenefitsHarassment & DiscriminationLabor RelationsWage and Hour  

Q&A: No-fault attendance policies must allow many exceptions

Question: We have a “no fault” attendance policy which assigns points for absences, tardies, and early departures. Employees are disciplined and eventually terminated if they reach a certain number of points. We know we have to allow exceptions for legally protected time off, but what if it’s unclear whether an absence is protected?  

Read More…
Photo of Karen Davis
Jul 03 2018
Wage and Hour  

Penalty for missed rest periods in California includes all compensation

A federal district court in California has ruled that when calculating the additional one hour of pay at the regular rate for missed rest periods under California Labor Code 226.7, an employer must include not only base pay, but also commissions, incentives, and bonuses. A group of 4,481 home mortgage…

Read More…
Photo of Kara Craig
Jun 19 2018
Wage and Hour  

Pay Washington agricultural piece-rate workers for nonproductive time

The Washington Supreme Court has ruled that employers are required to compensate agricultural piece-rate workers on a separate hourly basis for all nonproductive time spent performing activities outside of piece-rate picking work. This nonproductive time must be paid at the applicable minimum wage or a contractually agreed rate, whichever is…

Read More…