Home » Blog » Uncategorized » Page 2

Vigilant Blog

News, trends and analysis in employment law, HR, safety & workers' comp

Showing posts for: Uncategorized

Oct 08 2019
Uncategorized

WARN Act notice required for employment loss, not temporary layoff

An employer wasn’t required to give workers 60 days’ notice of a layoff lasting fewer than 6 months since the layoff wasn’t an “employment loss” under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act), according to a recent court decision. Under the WARN Act, an employer must give at least 60 days’ notice in…

Read More
Oct 08 2019
Uncategorized

Q&A: Duty to keep health insurance during workers’ comp is limited

Question: We have an employee out on leave to recover from a workplace injury. Are we supposed to keep her on our health insurance plan? Answer: It depends on whether the employee’s leave is protected by federal or state leave laws in addition to workers’ compensation. State workers’ comp laws generally don’t require employers to…

Read More
Oct 08 2019
Uncategorized

Employer pays $58K penalty after teen’s death

A Georgia company was found in violation of federal child labor laws prohibiting hazardous occupations for minors when it employed a 15-year-old to operate a power-driven weed cutter. Sadly, the teen drowned while cutting brush along a river. During its investigation, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) also found the employer had employed the teen…

Read More
Sep 11 2019
Uncategorized

Q&A: Don’t use lie detectors to investigate theft

Question: Our petty cash has been disappearing lately. There are three employees with access to the cash drawer. Can we use lie detectors as long as we test all three? Answer: No, that’s not enough to justify such a test. Although you’re attempting to be non-discriminatory in testing everyone, using lie detectors on employees is…

Read More
Jul 31 2019
Uncategorized

Montana employers can’t require employees to have microchips

Effective October 1, 2019, Montana employers can’t require employees to get microchip implants as a condition of employment. The Montana legislature passed and Governor Steve Bullock signed SB 286, which prohibits employers from making microchip implants a condition of employment, although employers may request and employees may volunteer for microchip implants. Also, if an employee…

Read More
May 06 2019
Uncategorized

Class arbitration requires employer’s consent

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that workers cannot force a company into class arbitration unless their arbitration agreement explicitly lists “class arbitration” as a way to resolve disputes, overturning a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision. In this case, the worker signed a contract prepared by the employer that said the worker agreed to…

Read More
Feb 13 2019
Uncategorized

Q&A: Do we have to cut ties with a valuable employee who harassed someone?

Question: We have a manager who is great at keeping production on pace and running efficiently, but he has a hard time getting along with other people. He recently said some really inappropriate things to one of his employees. Normally we would terminate for this behavior, but he is our top performer; can we avoid…

Read More
Feb 13 2019
Uncategorized

OSHA eases up on safety incentives and post-accident drug testing

The guidance is based on federal regulations at 29 CFR 1904.35 which prohibit employers from discriminating against workers or firing them for reporting work-related injuries and illnesses. In its new announcement, OSHA retracted informal Obama-era guidance that took a strict approach in evaluating whether workplace safety incentives and post-accident drug testing might illegally discourage workers…

Read More
Nov 02 2018
Uncategorized

Q&A: Pay equity analysis not a quick fix

Answer: You need to do a lot of homework before conducting a pay equity analysis. California, Oregon (as of January 1, 2019), and Washington have all revised their equal pay laws in ways that significantly increase employers’ potential liability for pay discrimination claims. Oregon’s law is particularly concerning because it takes into account 10 protected…

Read More
Mar 28 2018
Uncategorized

Dodd-Frank whistleblowers protected only if they report to SEC

On February 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that employees who report financial wrongdoing under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act are protected from retaliation only if they make their reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Supreme Court overruled a U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on…

Read More
Feb 06 2018
Uncategorized

EEO-1 Reports due March 31, 2018

After more than a year off from filing annual EEO-1 Reports, covered employers must once again submit data on the race/ethnicity and gender of their workforce, sorted into 10 job categories. For many years, September 30 was the annual deadline, but the 2017 report was moved to March 31, 2018, as part of an Obama-era…

Read More
Jan 16 2018
Uncategorized

FLSA minimum wage compliance is based on workweek, not hour

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that minimum wage compliance under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is based on the workweek, not the hour. Details of the Ruling Customer service employees at a call center earned different rates of pay depending on their tasks. The company used a workweek average…

Read More

Is My Company Eligible?

If you are a manufacturing or agriculture employer in Washington and committed to keeping your employees safe and working, you may be eligible for Vigilant's workers' compensation Retro or claims management programs. To see if you qualify fill out our release form now, or contact us.

Don’t Navigate Employment Issues On Your Own

Learn how Vigilant membership can help with your complex employment situations.
Scroll to Top